<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hooray For Arrays.Part(1)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://peoplesoftsqr.com/index.php/2009/07/hooray-for-arrayspart1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://peoplesoftsqr.com/index.php/2009/07/hooray-for-arrayspart1/</link>
	<description>When Peoplebooks Is Not Enough</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2010 16:52:22 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: administrator</title>
		<link>http://peoplesoftsqr.com/index.php/2009/07/hooray-for-arrayspart1/comment-page-1/#comment-1441</link>
		<dc:creator>administrator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 17:16:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peoplesoftsqr.com/?p=414#comment-1441</guid>
		<description>I was comparing the external (user) view of spreadsheets to the external view of arrays.  I don&#039;t &lt;em&gt;know&lt;/em&gt; how every spreadsheet program manages its data, but I&#039;d be surprised if a modern spreadsheet program didn&#039;t &quot;allocate memory dynamically using a sparse matrix.&quot;  For anyone working on a biography of me, you may note that I once wrote a spreadsheet program in interpreted BASIC that used a pre-allocated contiguous array.

I extrapolated from very little evidence to comment on SQR arrays&#039; memory model.  Each field in an SQR array has a pre-allocated block of memory, but I cannot tell whether all those blocks are contiguous.  Also, a string field has a contiguous block of string pointers, but I doubt the string space is allocated until used.  That would make it potentially quite different from a COBOL array of strings of predetermined length.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was comparing the external (user) view of spreadsheets to the external view of arrays.  I don&#8217;t <em>know</em> how every spreadsheet program manages its data, but I&#8217;d be surprised if a modern spreadsheet program didn&#8217;t &#8220;allocate memory dynamically using a sparse matrix.&#8221;  For anyone working on a biography of me, you may note that I once wrote a spreadsheet program in interpreted BASIC that used a pre-allocated contiguous array.</p>
<p>I extrapolated from very little evidence to comment on SQR arrays&#8217; memory model.  Each field in an SQR array has a pre-allocated block of memory, but I cannot tell whether all those blocks are contiguous.  Also, a string field has a contiguous block of string pointers, but I doubt the string space is allocated until used.  That would make it potentially quite different from a COBOL array of strings of predetermined length.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Josephson</title>
		<link>http://peoplesoftsqr.com/index.php/2009/07/hooray-for-arrayspart1/comment-page-1/#comment-1437</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Josephson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 16:15:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peoplesoftsqr.com/?p=414#comment-1437</guid>
		<description>Well, this is definitely not the topic I expected to see this week.

Good article anyway. I assume another big difference between arrays and spreadsheets would be that spreadsheets allocate memory dynamically using a sparse matrix technique, whereas arrays are completely pre-allocated in a contiguous block.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, this is definitely not the topic I expected to see this week.</p>
<p>Good article anyway. I assume another big difference between arrays and spreadsheets would be that spreadsheets allocate memory dynamically using a sparse matrix technique, whereas arrays are completely pre-allocated in a contiguous block.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
